Расширенный поиск
ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ СЕЙСМИЧЕСКИХ ВОЗДЕЙСТВИЙ НА СВОБОДНОЙ ПОВЕРХНОСТИ(СПЕКТРЫ РЕАКЦИИ И АКСЕЛЕРОГРАММЫ)
Институт физики Земли им. О.Ю. Шмидта РАН
Журнал: Вопросы инженерной сейсмологии
Том: 46
Номер: 4
Год: 2019
Страницы: 75-90
УДК: 550.34
DOI: 10.21455/VIS2019.4-5
Ключевые слова: сейсмическая опасность, спектр реакции, синтетические и искусственные акселерограммы, интегральные параметры, эквивалентное линейное моделирование, сейсмогеологические модели грунтов, пиковое ускорение
Аннотация: В работе сравниваются два способа задания исходных сейсмических воздействий на скальном основании: в виде искусственных и в виде синтетических акселерограмм. Для оценки влияния грунтов при передаче сейсмических воздействий от скального основания на свободную поверхность рассматривались четыре сейсмогеологические модели, а также два варианта поведения грунтовой толщи: линейное и эквивалентно-линейное. На основе совокупности проведенных расчетов установлено, что существенной разницы в сейсмических воздействиях, полученных на свободной поверхности в зависимости от метода задания сейсмических воздействий на скальном основании не обнаруживается. Различие спектров реакции на свободной поверхности в рамках рассмотренных моделей не выходит за пределы 10 % и потому не признается существенным.
Список литературы: Калинина А.В., Аммосов С.М., Быкова В.В., Татевосян Р.Э. О применимости стандартного спектра реакции для оценки ожидаемых сейсмических воздействий // Вопросы инженерной сейсмологии. 2017. Т. 44, № 2. С. 61-73.
Abrahamson N.A., Silva W.J., Kamai R. Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions // Earthq. Spectra. Aug 2014. V. 30 (3). P. 1025-1055. https://doi.org/10.1193/070913EQS198M
Acevedo Jaramillo A.B. Seismological criteria for selecting and scaling real accelerograms for use in engineering analysis and design: Master’s thesis. Pavia (Italia): Univ. of Pavia, ROSE School, 2003.
Bommer J., Acevedo A. The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis // J. Earthq. Engin. 2004. V. 8, spec. is. 1. P. 43-91.
Bommer J.J., Martinez-Pereira A. The effective duration of earthquake strong motion // J. Earthq. Engin. 1999. V. 3 (2). P. 127-172.
Boore D.M., Stewart J.P., Seyhan E., Atkinson G.M. NGA-West 2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes // Earthq. Spectra. Aug 2014. V. 30 (3). P. 1057-1085. https://doi.org/10.1193/070113EQS184M
Campbell K.W., Bozorgnia Y. NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped linear acceleration response spectra // Earthq. Spectra. Aug 2014. V. 30 (3). P. 1087-1115. https://doi.org/10.1193/062913EQS175M
Chiou B.S.-J., Youngs R.R. Update of the Chiou and Youngs. NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra // Earthq. Spectra. Aug 2014. V. 30 (3). P. 1117-1153. https://doi.org/10.1193/072813EQS219M
Green R., Lee J., Cameron W., Arenas A. Evaluation of various definitions of characteristic period of earthquake ground motions // 5th Intern. conf. on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Santiago, Chile, 2011.
Idriss I.M. Procedures for selecting earthquake ground motions at rock sites: Rep. to the US Depart. of Com. Nat. Instit. of Standarts and Technology. Washington, 1993.
Idriss I.M. An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes // Earthq. Spectra. Aug 2014. V. 30 (3). P. 1155-1177. https://doi.org/10.1193/070613EQS195M
Kottke A.R., Rathje E.M. Semi-automated selection and scaling of earthquake ground motions // 4th Intern. conf. on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2007.
Mukherjee S., Gupta V.K. Wavelet-based chacterization of design ground motion // Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynamics. 2002. V. 31, N 5. P. 1173-1190. https://doi.org./10.1002/eqe.155
Ordonez G.A. RSPMatchEDT. User’s manual. A pre-processor and post-processor for RSPMatch2005 & RSPMatch2009, 2011.
Ordonez G.A. SHAKE 2000 - a computer program for the 1-D analysis of geotechnical earthquake engineering problems. Washington, USA: GeoMotions, LLC; Lacey, 2012.
Rathje E.M., Faraj F., Russell S., Bray J.D. Empirical relationships for frequency content parameters of earthquake ground motions // Earthq. Spectra. 2004. V. 20 (1). P. 119-144.
Seed H.B., Idriss I.M. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses: Report No. EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1970. 40 p.
Vucetic M., Dobry R. Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response // J. Geotech. Engin. Division. ASCE. 1991. V. 17 (1). P. 89-107.
Watson-Lamprey J.A. Selection and scaling of ground motion time series: The dissertation. Univ. of California, Berkeley, Spring 2007.
Wenqi Du. An empirical model for the mean period (Tm) of ground motions using the NGA-West2 database // Bull. of Earthq. Engin. 2017a. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0088-8
Wenqi Du. Empirical correlations of frequency-content parameters of ground motions with other intensity measures // J. Earthq. Engin. 2017b. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1342303
Yaghmaei-Sabegh S., Karami S., Hosseini-Moghadam M. Selection and scaling of spectrum-compatible ground motion records using hybrid coded genetic algorithms // Scientia Iranica. 2017. V. 24 (3). P. 910-925.
Zentner I. Comparison of natural and synthetic spectrum compatible accelerograms obtained by ground motion selection and stochastic simulation // SECED 2015 Conference: Earthquake risk and engineering towards a resilient world, 9-10 July, 2015, Cambridge, UK.
Abrahamson N.A., Silva W.J., Kamai R. Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions // Earthq. Spectra. Aug 2014. V. 30 (3). P. 1025-1055. https://doi.org/10.1193/070913EQS198M
Acevedo Jaramillo A.B. Seismological criteria for selecting and scaling real accelerograms for use in engineering analysis and design: Master’s thesis. Pavia (Italia): Univ. of Pavia, ROSE School, 2003.
Bommer J., Acevedo A. The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis // J. Earthq. Engin. 2004. V. 8, spec. is. 1. P. 43-91.
Bommer J.J., Martinez-Pereira A. The effective duration of earthquake strong motion // J. Earthq. Engin. 1999. V. 3 (2). P. 127-172.
Boore D.M., Stewart J.P., Seyhan E., Atkinson G.M. NGA-West 2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes // Earthq. Spectra. Aug 2014. V. 30 (3). P. 1057-1085. https://doi.org/10.1193/070113EQS184M
Campbell K.W., Bozorgnia Y. NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped linear acceleration response spectra // Earthq. Spectra. Aug 2014. V. 30 (3). P. 1087-1115. https://doi.org/10.1193/062913EQS175M
Chiou B.S.-J., Youngs R.R. Update of the Chiou and Youngs. NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra // Earthq. Spectra. Aug 2014. V. 30 (3). P. 1117-1153. https://doi.org/10.1193/072813EQS219M
Green R., Lee J., Cameron W., Arenas A. Evaluation of various definitions of characteristic period of earthquake ground motions // 5th Intern. conf. on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Santiago, Chile, 2011.
Idriss I.M. Procedures for selecting earthquake ground motions at rock sites: Rep. to the US Depart. of Com. Nat. Instit. of Standarts and Technology. Washington, 1993.
Idriss I.M. An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes // Earthq. Spectra. Aug 2014. V. 30 (3). P. 1155-1177. https://doi.org/10.1193/070613EQS195M
Kottke A.R., Rathje E.M. Semi-automated selection and scaling of earthquake ground motions // 4th Intern. conf. on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2007.
Mukherjee S., Gupta V.K. Wavelet-based chacterization of design ground motion // Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynamics. 2002. V. 31, N 5. P. 1173-1190. https://doi.org./10.1002/eqe.155
Ordonez G.A. RSPMatchEDT. User’s manual. A pre-processor and post-processor for RSPMatch2005 & RSPMatch2009, 2011.
Ordonez G.A. SHAKE 2000 - a computer program for the 1-D analysis of geotechnical earthquake engineering problems. Washington, USA: GeoMotions, LLC; Lacey, 2012.
Rathje E.M., Faraj F., Russell S., Bray J.D. Empirical relationships for frequency content parameters of earthquake ground motions // Earthq. Spectra. 2004. V. 20 (1). P. 119-144.
Seed H.B., Idriss I.M. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses: Report No. EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1970. 40 p.
Vucetic M., Dobry R. Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response // J. Geotech. Engin. Division. ASCE. 1991. V. 17 (1). P. 89-107.
Watson-Lamprey J.A. Selection and scaling of ground motion time series: The dissertation. Univ. of California, Berkeley, Spring 2007.
Wenqi Du. An empirical model for the mean period (Tm) of ground motions using the NGA-West2 database // Bull. of Earthq. Engin. 2017a. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0088-8
Wenqi Du. Empirical correlations of frequency-content parameters of ground motions with other intensity measures // J. Earthq. Engin. 2017b. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1342303
Yaghmaei-Sabegh S., Karami S., Hosseini-Moghadam M. Selection and scaling of spectrum-compatible ground motion records using hybrid coded genetic algorithms // Scientia Iranica. 2017. V. 24 (3). P. 910-925.
Zentner I. Comparison of natural and synthetic spectrum compatible accelerograms obtained by ground motion selection and stochastic simulation // SECED 2015 Conference: Earthquake risk and engineering towards a resilient world, 9-10 July, 2015, Cambridge, UK.
