Расширенный поиск
СОПОСТАВЛЕНИЕ СТАНДАРТНЫХ (ТОЧЕЧНЫХ) И ПРОСТРАНСТВЕННЫХ ВЕРОЯТНОСТНЫХ ОЦЕНОК СЕЙСМИЧЕСКОЙ ОПАСНОСТИ
1 Геофизический институт
2 Технологический институт Карлсруэ, Германия
2 Технологический институт Карлсруэ, Германия
Журнал: Вопросы инженерной сейсмологии
Том: 41
Номер: 3
Год: 2014
Страницы: 5-22
Ключевые слова: пространственные оценки сейсмической опасности, сильные движения грунта, корреляция сильных движений
Аннотация: СОПОСТАВЛЕНИЕ СТАНДАРТНЫХ (ТОЧЕЧНЫХ) И ПРОСТРАНСТВЕННЫХ ВЕРОЯТНОСТНЫХ ОЦЕНОК СЕЙСМИЧЕСКОЙ ОПАСНОСТИ
Список литературы: СП 14.13330.2011: Свод правил. Строительство в сейсмических районах. Актуализированная редакция. СНиП II-7-81* 2011. М., 2011.
Соколов В.Ю. О моделировании пространственного распределения сильных движений грунта при оценках сейсмической опасности и риска // Вопросы инженерной сейсмологии. 2012. Т. 39, № 2. С. 5-22.
Соколов В.Ю., Венцель Ф. Корреляция сильных движений грунта и ее влияние на оценки сейсмической опасности для протяженных объектов // Вопросы инженерной сейсмологии. 2011. Т. 38, № 4. С. 5-15.
Соколов В.Ю., Венцель Ф. Моделирование сильных движений грунта при оценках сейсмических потерь для городских территорий в регионах с недостаточным количеством записей сильных движений: выбор моделей корреляции // Вопросы инженерной сейсмологии. 2013. Т. 40, № 3. С. 5-22.
Чернов Ю.К. Сильные движения грунта и количественная оценка сейсмической опасности территорий. Ташкент: Фан, 1989. 295 с.
Akkar S., Bommer J.J. Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East // Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn. 2007. V. 36 (10). P. 1275-1301.
Assatourians K., Atkinson G.M. EqHaz: an open-source probabilistic seismic-hazard code based on the Monte Carlo simulation approach // Seism. Res. Lett. 2013. V. 84. P. 516-524. doi:10.1785/0220120102.
Bommer J.J., Crowley H. The influence of ground-motion variability in earthquake loss modeling // Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2006. V. 4 (3). P. 231-248. doi:10.1007/s10518-006-9008-z.
Bommer J.J., Douglas J., Strasser F.O. Style-of-faulting in ground motion-prediction equations // Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2003. V. 1. P. 171-203. doi: 10.1023/A:1026323123154.
Burkhard M., Grünthal G. Seismic source zone characterization for the seismic hazard assessment project PEGASOS by the expert Group 2 (EG 1b) // Swiss J. Geosci. 2009. V. 102. P. 149-188.
Cornell C.A. Engineering seismic risk analysis // Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 1968. V. 58. P. 1583-1606.
Du W., Wang W. Intra-event spatial correlations for cumulative absolute velocity, Arias intensity, and spectral accelerations based on regional site conditions // Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 2013. V. 103. P. 1117-1129. doi: 10.1785/0120120185.
Ebel J.E., Kafka A.L. A Monte Carlo approach to seismic hazard analysis // Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 1999. V. 89. P. 854-866.
Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Pt. 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization, 2004. (EN 1998-1).
Grünthal G., Arvidsson R., Bosse Ch. Earthquake model for the European-Mediterranean region for the purpose of GEM1. 2010. (Sci. Tech. Rep. STR10/04). 35 p. URL: http://www.globalquakemodel.org/media/publication/GEM-TechnicalReport_2010-E2.pdf
Jayaram N., Baker J.W. Correlation models for spatially distributed ground motion intensities // Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn. 2009. V. 38. P. 1687-1708. doi: 10.1002/eqe.922.
Loh C.H., Jean W.Y. Seismic zoning on ground motion in Taiwan area // Proc. of 14th International conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Germany, 6-12 September. 1997. P. 71-79.
McGuire R.K. Seismic hazard and risk analysis. Oakland, CA: Earthq. Eng. Res. Institute, 2004. 240 p.
McVerry G.H., Rhoades D.A., Smith W.D. Joint hazard of earthquake shaking at multiple locations // Proc. 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, August 1-6, 2004. Vancouver, 2004. Pr. 646.
Musson R.M.W. Determination of design earthquakes in seismic hazard analysis through Monte Carlo simulation // J. Earthq. Eng. 1999. V. 3 (4). P. 463-474.
Musson R.M.W. PSHA validated by quazi observational means // Seism. Res. Lett. 2012. V. 83. P. 130-134.
NFP06-013: Regles de construction parasismique aux batiments, dites regles PS92, norme francaise, AFNOR, 1995. 217 p.
Rhoades D.A., McVerry G.H. Joint hazard of earthquake shaking at two or more locations // Earthq. Spectra. 2001. V. 17 (4). P. 697-710.
Park J., Bazzurro P., Baker J.W. Modeling spatial correlation of ground motion intensity measures for regional seismic hazard and portfolio loss estimations // Applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering / Eds J. Kanda, T. Takada, H. Furuta. London: Taylor and Francis Group, 2007. P. 1-8.
Seismic force requirements for buildings in Taiwan extracted from: 2005 seismic design code for buildings in Taiwan. 2005. URL: http://iisee.kenken.go.jp/worldlist/51_Taiwan/51_Taiwan_Code.pdf
Sokolov V., Wenzel F. Influence of spatial correlation of strong ground-motion on uncertainty in earthquake loss estimation // Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn. 2011a. V. 40. P. 993-1009. doi: 10.1002/eqe.1074.
Sokolov V., Wenzel F. Influence of ground-motion correlation on probabilistic assessments of seismic hazard and loss: Sensitivity analysis // Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2011b. V. 9 (5). P. 1339-1360. doi: 10.1007/s10518-011-9264-4.
Sokolov V., Wenzel F. Spatial correlation of ground-motions in estimating seismic hazard to civil infrastructure // Seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems / Eds S. Tesfamariam, K. Goda. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publ. Ltd, 2013a. P. 57-78. doi: 10.1533/9780857098986.1.57.
Sokolov V., Wenzel F. Further analysis of the influence of site conditions and earthquake magnitude on ground-motion within-earthquake correlation: Analysis of PGA and PGV data from the K-NET and the KiK-net (Japan) networks // Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2013b. V. 11(6). P. 1909-1926. doi: 10.1007/s10518-013-9493-9.
Sokolov V., Wenzel F., Jean W.Y., Wen K.L. Uncertainty and spatial correlation of earthquake ground motion in Taiwan // Terrestial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (TAO). 2010. V. 21. P. 905-921. doi: 10.3319/TAO.2010.05.03.01(T).
Sokolov V., Wenzel F., Wen K.L., Jean W.Y. On the influence of site conditions and earthquake magnitude on ground-motion within-earthquake correlation: Analysis of PGA data from TSMIP (Taiwan) network // Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2012. V. 10 (5). P. 1401-1429. doi: 10.1007/s10518-012-9368-5.
Wang M., Takada T. Macrospatial correlation model of seismic ground motions // Earthq. Spectra. 2005. V. 21 (4). P. 1137-1156. doi: 10.1193/1.2083887.
Wesson R.L., Perkins D.M. Spatial correlation of probabilistic earthquake ground motion and loss // Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 2001. V. 91. P. 1498-1515.
Соколов В.Ю. О моделировании пространственного распределения сильных движений грунта при оценках сейсмической опасности и риска // Вопросы инженерной сейсмологии. 2012. Т. 39, № 2. С. 5-22.
Соколов В.Ю., Венцель Ф. Корреляция сильных движений грунта и ее влияние на оценки сейсмической опасности для протяженных объектов // Вопросы инженерной сейсмологии. 2011. Т. 38, № 4. С. 5-15.
Соколов В.Ю., Венцель Ф. Моделирование сильных движений грунта при оценках сейсмических потерь для городских территорий в регионах с недостаточным количеством записей сильных движений: выбор моделей корреляции // Вопросы инженерной сейсмологии. 2013. Т. 40, № 3. С. 5-22.
Чернов Ю.К. Сильные движения грунта и количественная оценка сейсмической опасности территорий. Ташкент: Фан, 1989. 295 с.
Akkar S., Bommer J.J. Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East // Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn. 2007. V. 36 (10). P. 1275-1301.
Assatourians K., Atkinson G.M. EqHaz: an open-source probabilistic seismic-hazard code based on the Monte Carlo simulation approach // Seism. Res. Lett. 2013. V. 84. P. 516-524. doi:10.1785/0220120102.
Bommer J.J., Crowley H. The influence of ground-motion variability in earthquake loss modeling // Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2006. V. 4 (3). P. 231-248. doi:10.1007/s10518-006-9008-z.
Bommer J.J., Douglas J., Strasser F.O. Style-of-faulting in ground motion-prediction equations // Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2003. V. 1. P. 171-203. doi: 10.1023/A:1026323123154.
Burkhard M., Grünthal G. Seismic source zone characterization for the seismic hazard assessment project PEGASOS by the expert Group 2 (EG 1b) // Swiss J. Geosci. 2009. V. 102. P. 149-188.
Cornell C.A. Engineering seismic risk analysis // Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 1968. V. 58. P. 1583-1606.
Du W., Wang W. Intra-event spatial correlations for cumulative absolute velocity, Arias intensity, and spectral accelerations based on regional site conditions // Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 2013. V. 103. P. 1117-1129. doi: 10.1785/0120120185.
Ebel J.E., Kafka A.L. A Monte Carlo approach to seismic hazard analysis // Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 1999. V. 89. P. 854-866.
Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Pt. 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization, 2004. (EN 1998-1).
Grünthal G., Arvidsson R., Bosse Ch. Earthquake model for the European-Mediterranean region for the purpose of GEM1. 2010. (Sci. Tech. Rep. STR10/04). 35 p. URL: http://www.globalquakemodel.org/media/publication/GEM-TechnicalReport_2010-E2.pdf
Jayaram N., Baker J.W. Correlation models for spatially distributed ground motion intensities // Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn. 2009. V. 38. P. 1687-1708. doi: 10.1002/eqe.922.
Loh C.H., Jean W.Y. Seismic zoning on ground motion in Taiwan area // Proc. of 14th International conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Germany, 6-12 September. 1997. P. 71-79.
McGuire R.K. Seismic hazard and risk analysis. Oakland, CA: Earthq. Eng. Res. Institute, 2004. 240 p.
McVerry G.H., Rhoades D.A., Smith W.D. Joint hazard of earthquake shaking at multiple locations // Proc. 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, August 1-6, 2004. Vancouver, 2004. Pr. 646.
Musson R.M.W. Determination of design earthquakes in seismic hazard analysis through Monte Carlo simulation // J. Earthq. Eng. 1999. V. 3 (4). P. 463-474.
Musson R.M.W. PSHA validated by quazi observational means // Seism. Res. Lett. 2012. V. 83. P. 130-134.
NFP06-013: Regles de construction parasismique aux batiments, dites regles PS92, norme francaise, AFNOR, 1995. 217 p.
Rhoades D.A., McVerry G.H. Joint hazard of earthquake shaking at two or more locations // Earthq. Spectra. 2001. V. 17 (4). P. 697-710.
Park J., Bazzurro P., Baker J.W. Modeling spatial correlation of ground motion intensity measures for regional seismic hazard and portfolio loss estimations // Applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering / Eds J. Kanda, T. Takada, H. Furuta. London: Taylor and Francis Group, 2007. P. 1-8.
Seismic force requirements for buildings in Taiwan extracted from: 2005 seismic design code for buildings in Taiwan. 2005. URL: http://iisee.kenken.go.jp/worldlist/51_Taiwan/51_Taiwan_Code.pdf
Sokolov V., Wenzel F. Influence of spatial correlation of strong ground-motion on uncertainty in earthquake loss estimation // Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn. 2011a. V. 40. P. 993-1009. doi: 10.1002/eqe.1074.
Sokolov V., Wenzel F. Influence of ground-motion correlation on probabilistic assessments of seismic hazard and loss: Sensitivity analysis // Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2011b. V. 9 (5). P. 1339-1360. doi: 10.1007/s10518-011-9264-4.
Sokolov V., Wenzel F. Spatial correlation of ground-motions in estimating seismic hazard to civil infrastructure // Seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems / Eds S. Tesfamariam, K. Goda. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publ. Ltd, 2013a. P. 57-78. doi: 10.1533/9780857098986.1.57.
Sokolov V., Wenzel F. Further analysis of the influence of site conditions and earthquake magnitude on ground-motion within-earthquake correlation: Analysis of PGA and PGV data from the K-NET and the KiK-net (Japan) networks // Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2013b. V. 11(6). P. 1909-1926. doi: 10.1007/s10518-013-9493-9.
Sokolov V., Wenzel F., Jean W.Y., Wen K.L. Uncertainty and spatial correlation of earthquake ground motion in Taiwan // Terrestial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (TAO). 2010. V. 21. P. 905-921. doi: 10.3319/TAO.2010.05.03.01(T).
Sokolov V., Wenzel F., Wen K.L., Jean W.Y. On the influence of site conditions and earthquake magnitude on ground-motion within-earthquake correlation: Analysis of PGA data from TSMIP (Taiwan) network // Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2012. V. 10 (5). P. 1401-1429. doi: 10.1007/s10518-012-9368-5.
Wang M., Takada T. Macrospatial correlation model of seismic ground motions // Earthq. Spectra. 2005. V. 21 (4). P. 1137-1156. doi: 10.1193/1.2083887.
Wesson R.L., Perkins D.M. Spatial correlation of probabilistic earthquake ground motion and loss // Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 2001. V. 91. P. 1498-1515.
